To view this page ensure that Adobe Flash Player version 10.0.0 or greater is installed.
Clip
Fri 24 May: Coming Up Mon 27 May
Clip
Fri 24 May: Amy Childs The Only Way Is Essex
Clip
Thu 23 May: Coming up on Fri 24 May
Clip
Thu 23 May: Josh Groban talks about gifts from fans
Clip
Wed 22 May: Coming up on Thurs 23 May
Clip
Wed 22 May: Happy birthday Arlene Phillips
Clip
Tue 21 May: Coming up on Wed 22 May
Clip
Tue 21 May: Bronagh Waugh hellos
Clip
Mon 20 May: Coming Up Tuesday 21 May
Clip
Mon 20 May: Donal MacIntyre speaks about label animal tested...
Clip
Fri 17 May: Coming Up Monday 20 May
Clip
Fri 17 May: Alan Fletcher sings Neighbours
Comments (2)
6 months ago
Amy Bellamy
A woman who uses a surrogate cannot adopt that child, either because the child is biologically the intended parents or because the child will not have been placed with the parents through an adoption agency. So no the intended mother isn't entitled to SAP Peter Randle. As the current law states only the birth mother or the parent of a child placed by an adoption agency is entitled to SMP or SAP, nothing is in place for leave or pay for people who choose to have a child through surrogacy for one reason or another. The only sad thing is that the intended parents usually aren't informed that they aren't entitled to the same things as any other parent until the surrogate is pregnant or people might think about it a but harder.
8 months ago
Peter Randle
If the mother wanted the surrogate baby then she would adopt the baby and by doing so be entitled to SAP (Statutory Adoption Pay") which is as good as or better than SMP. Why should the mother be entitled to both? If the mother didn't want the baby after the surrogate gave birth then she wouldn't adopt the baby and would and should be entitled to neither SAP nor SMP but the surrogate mother would then quite rightly be entitled to SMP. There's no argument surely and therefore the item was a waste of time.